But truth, cher ami, is a colossal bore.
- narrator, Camus' The Fall
...



...

LEST I AM JUDGED FOR THIS
[disclaimer and message]

MINI POSTS
[brief and frequently-posted messages]

AUDIO AND VIDEO
[audio and video streams and downloads]

MOBILE POSTS
[content posted from a mobile phone]

PODCAST FEED
[for podcasts only -- no text]

RSS FEED
[for text and podcasts]

ARCHIVE
[past posts]

E-MAIL
[me]
 

mini updates:
    follow me on Twitter

    dear reader/listener/viewer/enjoyer/co-conspirator:
    lest i be judged for it, i inform you now that this project continues to be a scratch pad, a space for experimentation

    in other words, enjoy what you find here, and feel free to participate, but try not to take anything personal, and don't believe that this project presents an accurate view of me or my life

    this is a window, certainly, but one that hasn't been cleaned in quite some time

    your view may be foggy, obscure...you may see things that aren't really there...

    --harold

    want some background music?
    please consider downloading my most recent music podcast.

    and yes, i love my mom and my dad;
    they've always been good to me, no matter what impression you may have received here

    they never locked me in a cellar or anything
     
    highlighted post from the archives: me rambling about a new job (from two years ago)
    i recently messed with the archives, so they may not work correctly, but you may take your chances:
    December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 November 2007 February 2008 March 2008 May 2008

    i once was an active member of the

    association of music podcasting

    musicpodcasting.org

    along with these fine music podcasters:

    all florida indies - bing futch
    audio gumshoe - rich palmer
    audio popcorn - krash coarse
    aural icebergs music cast - tiffany rapplean
    capital rock show - bucket aka jason
    darkhorse radio - alan carr
    ears to hear - jill lawton
    eclectic mix - george l smyth
    homegrown podcast - nic treadwell
    indiefeed - chris macdonald
    le jazz affair - sal calfa
    rubyfruit radio - heather smith
    sober cafe podcast - gracie hollombe
    sundown lounge - larry winfield
    tempo of the down - harold (that's me!)
    the darkcompass podcast - rowland cutler
    the fabrications podcast - matt macfarlane
    the phill(er) - phill ramey
    the radiozoom podcast - john bollwitt
    thepillarcast.com - jon tucker
    uc radio podshow - michael yusi
    zaldor's world - les zaldor

    ¡the text on this blog wants to leap out of its borders!

    this is...

    something that happened

    somethingthathappened.com
    		stories by harold j. johnson, in various formats - including text, audio, video, and podcasts
     
     
    Saturday, November 10, 2007  

    I consider myself a sceptic (or skeptic), though I seriously disagree with the American Heritage Dictionary's first definition of the term (which you can find on Dictionary.com):
    1. One who instinctively or habitually doubts, questions, or disagrees with assertions or generally accepted conclusions.
    Habitually? Come on, dictionary, that's just rude -- and simply not true. Sceptics don't habitually disagree; sceptics disagree when the occasion calls for it, such as when the conclusion is bullshit. Particularly when it's harmful bullshit.



    Seems to me that scepticism isn't much appreciated by the Heritage.



    But fuck the dictionary. I've been watching this television program, Phenomenon, which is more or less an American Idol for magicians (or more specifically, mentalists). Now, I believe most magicians are sceptics, at least in the sense that they know magic isn't truly paranormal or anything ridiculous like that. Magicians know better than anyone that they're practicing the art of illusion, not sorcery. Houdini himself was a debunker of the paranormal, and artists like Penn & Teller continue the tradition with shows like Bullshit!



    Most stage magicians aren't harming anyone; they're simply entertaining. (Unless you consider a "healer" a magician, in which case they could be causing direct financial and emotional harm.) And I enjoy a good magic performance from time to time. I especially admire when a magician really gets me scratching my head wondering How did she do that? Magic is great entertainment, and there's no need to debunk it during its performance. (Though I appreciate disproving a performance that is truly harming people, such as when "psychics" or "healers" put the squeeze on people). It's simply not necessary to spoil magic performances, even the psychic ones; it's harmless fun for someone who goes to a psychic for the kick of it. (Unless they begin relying on the psychic to foretell they're future every week.)



    With stage performances of magic clearly designed for entertainment, most folks know it's all illusion but still find it fun to be duped. People appreciate a good trick, and some find it equally enjoyable to find out how the stunt was pulled off. The show Phenomenon is entertaining when you keep in mind its premise: discovering and critiquing new talent. In that sense, it somewhat satisfies both those who appreciate magic shows as entertainment and those who enjoy disproving the paranormal. This is because Phenomenon is a combination of American Idol-like auditions and guest judge Criss Angel's Houdini-like debunking of some of the magician's paranormal claims. It's a rare show in that it may be equally enjoyable to both believers and sceptics.



    Still, something bothers, leaves me feeling unsatisfied. Maybe it's just that I'm not used to seeing sceptics and believers finding common ground. There's something disconcerting about this. It's somewhat like watching a Penn & Teller magic show, and after each trick the guys explain how the illusion worked. Kind of spoils the fun, doesn't it? Then again, maybe I'm just not used to it yet, and maybe it just depends on the mood you're in. Sometimes you're in the mood to believe in magic, other times you're in the mood for more critically-minded entertainment. Is there room for both at the same party? I guess we'll find out.



    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

    11/10/2007 11:10:00 PM (0) comments





     
     

    powdered fresh and frequently by blogger.
    D-List Blogger